Lee van der Voo tells Romenesko readers: I was just informed by State Farm here in Oregon, where I?m an independent investigative journalist, that they are dumping my office rental policy because of the kind of journalism I do. I asked whether if I were to write food reviews or puff pieces about bridal gowns they would insure me, and I was told yes, ?just no controversial journalism.?
My landlord requires I have property insurance on the office I use for work, and I went to State Farm a couple weeks ago because I needed a new policy and I do all my other business with them.
I own a house and insure it through State Farm, along with the three cars I?ve owned over the last 12 years. They pre-approved the rental policy and I paid for it. But apparently a State Farm underwriter decided today that I?m out, based on a visit to my web site. They say they can?t separate the property insurance I need from any potential liability issues that could arise.
The real pickle is this leaves me with two extremely crappy options: I can either withdraw the coverage myself and go without property insurance and risk losing my office, or I can continue coverage for 45 days ? which State Farm is now obligated to provide me by law ? but in exchange I will get an official letter of rejection that I?ll have to carry henceforth from one insurer to the next.
I?m more than a little worried about what this means for my office security, and for indie journalism. It?s hard enough to get liability coverage ? a good number of bloggers and freelancers already work without it ? but if meaningful, probing, and thought-provoking news coverage can clean a freelancer out of property insurance, then investigative journalism just got a little harder.
Comments
Source: http://jimromenesko.com/2013/01/23/no-insurance-for-you-investigative-reporter/
carl hagelin triple play james neal jackie robinson virginia tech emancipation proclamation april 16
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.